|
|
books
| book details |
Topics in Classical Micro- and Macroeconomics: Elements of a Critique of Neoricardian Theory
By (author) Peter Flaschel
|
| on special |
normal price: R 4 932.95
Price: R 4 439.95
|
| book description |
This book on Classical micro- and macrodynamics includes revised versions of papers which were written between 1983 and 2000, some jointly with co-authors, and it supplements them with recent work on the issues which are raised and treated in them. It attempts to demonstrate to the reader that themes of Classical economics, in particular in the tradition of Smith, Ricardo and Marx, can be synthesized into a coherent whole, from the perspective of formal model building. This is accomplished by means of mathematical techniques which, on the one hand, provide a consistent accounting framework (labor values and prices of p- duction) as point of reference for Classical micro- and macro-dynamics and which, on the other hand, attempt to apply these accounting schemes – or suitable ext- sions of them – by showing their usefulness as tools of analysis of the implications of technological change (labor values) and as potential tools for understanding the dynamics of market prices and of income distribution around their centers of gravity (production prices and the wage-pro?t curve).
| product details |
Normally shipped |
Publisher | Springer-Verlag Berlin and Heidelberg GmbH & Co. KG
Published date | 27 Nov 2014
Language |
Format | Paperback / softback
Pages | 507
Dimensions | 235 x 155 x 0mm (L x W x H)
Weight | 0g
ISBN | 978-3-6424-2632-2
Readership Age |
BISAC | business & economics / economics / macroeconomics
| other options |
Normally shipped |
Readership Age |
Normal Price | R 6 536.95
Price | R 5 883.95
| on special |
|
|
To view the items in your trolley please sign in.
| sign in |
|
|
|
| specials |
|
|
Mason Coile
Paperback / softback
224 pages
was: R 520.95
now: R 468.95
|
A terrifying locked-room mystery set in a remote outpost on Mars.
|
An epic love story with the pulse of a thriller that asks: what would you risk for a second chance at first love?
|
|
|
|
|
|
