|
|
books
| book details |
Redefining Global Economic Thinking for the Welfare of Society
Edited by Md Mashiur Rahman, Edited by Richa Goel, Edited by Anthony P. Gomes, Edited by Md Almas Uzzaman
|
| on special |
normal price: R 7 576.95
Price: R 7 197.95
|
| book description |
The richest one percent of the entire population of the world now owns more than half of the global wealth. Global wealth is unequally distributed, gross domestic product (GDP) and consumption are a declining trend, and poverty is an increasing trend. Each participant's gain or loss of utility is exactly balanced by the losses or gains of the utility of the other participants, which certainly drives an unhealthy and unhappy globe. As such, global economic thinking must be redefined in order to encourage inclusive development and better problem solving. Redefining Global Economic Thinking for the Welfare of Society is a comprehensive reference source that examines the prevailing economic theories and thinking, determines the deficiency of some of the existing economic thinking, and sets up guidelines and transformation of existing economic thinking. Covering topics that include economic development, circular economy, and population health, this serves as an excellent resource for economists, sociologists, government officials, policymakers, practitioners, faculties of universities and colleges, students, researchers, and academicians.
| product details |
Normally shipped |
Publisher | IGI Global
Published date | 30 Dec 2021
Language |
Format | Paperback / softback
Pages | 330
Dimensions | 279 x 216 x 0mm (L x W x H)
Weight | 633g
ISBN | 978-1-7998-8259-6
Readership Age |
BISAC | business & economics / economics / theory
| other options |
|
|
To view the items in your trolley please sign in.
| sign in |
|
|
|
| specials |
|
This is indeed a story of mercy and the redemption it offers.
|
Emil Coetzee, a civil servant in his fifties, is washing blood off his hands when the ceasefire is announced.
|
An epic love story with the pulse of a thriller that asks: what would you risk for a second chance at first love?
|
|
|
|
