|
|
books
| book details |
The New Empire of AI: The Future of Global Inequality
By (author) Rachel Adams
|
|
This book is currently unavailable. Enquire to check if we can source a used copy
|
| book description |
As AI takes hold across the planet and wealthy nations seek to position themselves as global leaders of this new technology, the gap is widening between those who benefit from it and those who are subjugated by it. As Rachel Adams shows in this hard-hitting book, growing inequality is the single biggest threat to the transformative potential of AI. Not only is AI built on an unequal global system of power, it stands poised to entrench existing inequities, further consolidating a new age of empire. AI’s impact on inequality will not be experienced in poorer countries only: it will be felt everywhere. The effects will be seen in an intensification of international migration, as opportunities increasingly concentrate in the hands of wealthier nations; in heightened political instability and populist politics; and in climate-related disasters caused by an industry that is blind to its environmental impact across supply chains. We need to act now to address these issues. Only if the current inequitable trajectory of AI is halted, the incentives changed, and the production and use of AI decentralized and decoupled from wealthier nations will AI be able to deliver on its promise to build a better world for all. Also available as an audiobook
| product details |
Normally shipped |
Publisher | Polity Press
Published date | 23 Jan 2026
Language |
Format | Paperback / softback
Pages | 224
Dimensions | 213 x 137 x 20mm (L x W x H)
Weight | 295g
ISBN | 978-1-5095-5310-5
Readership Age |
BISAC | technology / social aspects
| other options |
|
|
|
To view the items in your trolley please sign in.
| sign in |
|
|
|
| specials |
|
|
|
Mason Coile
Paperback / softback
224 pages
was: R 520.95
now: R 468.95
|
A terrifying locked-room mystery set in a remote outpost on Mars.
|
An epic love story with the pulse of a thriller that asks: what would you risk for a second chance at first love?
|
|
|
|
|