|
|
|
books
| book details |
South Africa's Multilateral Diplomacy and Global Change: The Limits of Reformism: The Limits of Reformism
Edited by Philip Nel, Edited by Ian Taylor, Edited by Janis Westhuizen
|
|
This book is currently unavailable. Enquire to check if we can source a used copy
|
| book description |
This title was first published in 2001. Post-apartheid South Africa's foreign policy has accepted a range of leadership responsibilities within multilateral institutions. This text assesses how, in these various leadership capacities, South Africa has been able to ""punch above its weight"" diplomatically. Pretoria's intervention or support for a particular position has sometimes been crucial in breaking a deadlock or securing the co-operation of others. South Africa has also used its profile to act as a voice for the vunerable, smaller states in world affairs. Based on their assessment of globalization as a process that holds some benefits, but also many dangers, for developing countries, both the Mandela and Mbeki persidencies have used multilateral forums to push for a greater say by developing countries in global governance. This position seems to indicate a reformist tendency in South African foreign policy. This book examines whether Pretoria's multilateral diplomacy contributes to global transformation, or whether South Africa's policies help maintain a fundamentally flawed global order.
| product details |
Normally shipped |
Publisher | Taylor & Francis Ltd
Published date | 31 Dec 2023
Language |
Format | Digital (delivered electronically)
Pages | 0
Dimensions | 0 x 0 x 0mm (L x W x H)
Weight | 0g
ISBN | 978-1-3517-8958-5
Readership Age |
BISAC | political science / international relations / diplomacy
| other options |
|
|
|
To view the items in your trolley please sign in.
| sign in |
|
|
|
| specials |
|
|
Mason Coile
Paperback / softback
224 pages
was: R 520.95
now: R 468.95
|
A terrifying locked-room mystery set in a remote outpost on Mars.
|
An epic love story with the pulse of a thriller that asks: what would you risk for a second chance at first love?
|
|
|
|
|
|
